Review of Nursing and Healthcare Research

Review of Nursing and Healthcare Research (RNHR) is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access and scholarly journal which publishes high quality, innovative, and well-developed manuscripts covering original research articles, review articles, book reviews and case reports aimed at advancing both theoretical and practical development on all related aspects of nursing and healthcare.

Current Issue

Review of Nursing and Healthcare Research (RNHR) is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access and scholarly journal which publishes high quality, innovative, and well-developed manuscripts covering original research articles, review articles, book reviews and case reports aimed at advancing both theoretical and practical development on all related aspects of nursing and healthcare.

Published
2025-08-28

Articles

Knowledge, experiences, and coping practices of female adolescents toward dysmenorrhea in selected secondary schools in Ibadan North Local Government Area, Oyo State

Purpose: To assess female adolescents’ knowledge, attitudes, experiences, and coping practices regarding dysmenorrhea in selected secondary schools in Ibadan North LGA, Oyo State, Nigeria. Methodology/approach: Descriptive cross-sectional survey of 200 female students (mean age 14.98 ± 2.48) using a structured, self-administered questionnaire; analysis conducted in SPSS v25 with descriptive statistics (frequencies, percentages, means, SD). Results/findings: Dysmenorrhea was prevalent (72.5%) and commonly interfered with daily activities (82.5%) and school attendance (47.5%). Knowledge was generally moderate, but misconceptions about causes and severity persisted. Coping was largely self-managed: analgesics (50.0%) and rest (45.0%) were most common; healthcare-seeking was relatively low (12.5%). Conclusions: Dysmenorrhea substantially affects adolescents’ functioning and academic participation, with knowledge gaps and low utilization of professional care. Strengthening school-based menstrual health education and access to adolescent-friendly services is essential. Limitations: Cross-sectional, self-reported data from selected schools in one LGA limit causal inference and generalizability; analyses were primarily descriptive. Contribution: Provides local baseline evidence to inform targeted school interventions, safe coping guidance, and improved help-seeking for menstrual pain among adolescents.

Assessment of routine immunization default rates and evaluation of catch-up strategies among mothers of children aged 0–59 months in Ido Local Government Area, Oyo State, Nigeria

Purpose: This study aimed to determine the prevalence and determinants of routine immunization default among mothers of children aged 0–59 months in Ido Local Government Area (LGA), Oyo State, Nigeria, and to evaluate the effectiveness of implemented catch-up strategies. Methodology/approach: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted with 420 mothers selected through multi-stage sampling. Data were obtained using structured interviewer-administered questionnaires and analyzed with SPSS version 26. Descriptive statistics summarized sociodemographic and immunization variables, while logistic regression identified predictors of defaulting. Key informant interviews with healthcare providers were thematically analyzed to assess catch-up strategies and contextual barriers. Results/findings: The study revealed an immunization default rate of 34.8%. The main reasons cited for defaulting included lack of awareness of return dates (41.2%), long distances to health facilities (26.5%), and vaccine stock-outs (19.3%). Significant predictors were maternal education level (p=0.002), place of delivery (p=0.015), and knowledge of immunization schedules (p<0.001). Catch-up strategies such as house-to-house visits, SMS reminders, and mobilization by religious and traditional leaders were moderately effective but insufficient in hard-to-reach areas. Conclusions: Routine immunization defaulting persists as a significant public health challenge in Ido LGA. Socioeconomic, educational, and systemic barriers hinder full coverage, necessitating more robust interventions Limitations: The cross-sectional design restricts causal inference, and self-reported data may introduce recall bias. Contribution: The study provides empirical evidence to strengthen catch-up strategies and guide policy toward equitable immunization coverage.